systemd (Was Re: tmpfs for strategic directories)

[Tomasz Torcz]

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:26:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > The problem we've found is that cgroups are too aggressive. They don't have a
> > notion of sessions and count too much as being part of your service, so you end
> > up with your screen session being counted as part of gdm.
> 
> 
> The per-user cgroups are controlled via a PAM module. That way there's
> finally a nice way how we can reliably clean up behind a user when he logs out:
> we just kill his complete cgroup and he's gone.

  You are avoiding the question: what about screen sessions? Whole
point of screen is to stay after logout, and by killing cgroup you
nullify it.
 
-- 
Tomasz Torcz               RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile.
xmpp: zdzichubg at chrome.pl     Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 238 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100526/29c7f165/attachment.bin