tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.

[Ryan Rix]

On Sat 29 May 2010 11:10:35 pm Matthew Miller wrote:
> And this one is: packages should not print out messages complaining about
> the state of other packages in Fedora. That's not the right process for
> solving those issues. If redhat-lsb is broken, there's a procedure for
> dealing with that, and it isn't "give confusing warnings to the end
> users!"

+1

Airing out our dirty laundry for our users to see is not something that we 
should allow or promote. I'm all for reporting errors, but b*tching to 
users? No. I'm going to file a bug on this if someone else has not.

It's pretty non-excellent of this package's maintainer, but judging by his 
previous actions I am not surprised. He has shown in the past that he has no 
qualms with breaking the "be excellent to eachother" rule.

Ryan

-- 
Ryan Rix
== http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
== http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word         ==
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100531/7a9e78a3/attachment.bin