tor-lsb -- hey, look, package script, don't complain to _me_. I'm just installing you.
ry at n.rix.si
Mon May 31 18:49:04 UTC 2010
On Sat 29 May 2010 11:10:35 pm Matthew Miller wrote:
> And this one is: packages should not print out messages complaining about
> the state of other packages in Fedora. That's not the right process for
> solving those issues. If redhat-lsb is broken, there's a procedure for
> dealing with that, and it isn't "give confusing warnings to the end
Airing out our dirty laundry for our users to see is not something that we
should allow or promote. I'm all for reporting errors, but b*tching to
users? No. I'm going to file a bug on this if someone else has not.
It's pretty non-excellent of this package's maintainer, but judging by his
previous actions I am not surprised. He has shown in the past that he has no
qualms with breaking the "be excellent to eachother" rule.
== http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
== http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word ==
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100531/7a9e78a3/attachment.bin
More information about the devel