Package review template

Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotnicky at redhat.com
Mon Nov 1 14:58:15 UTC 2010


On 11/01/2010 03:32 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I just put my package review template on my wiki space at :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jfsaucier/Review_Template

I created something similar specifically for Java reviews with Java SIG
members improving it bit by bit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java_review_template

> My template is simply a collection based on other's already existing
> template. What I did is I tried to put missing checks and sort them in
> an order that should go well when doing a review.

From the looks of it, I'd say we used the same base :-)


> My goal here is to try to produce a good review template to publicize
> and help people doing package review. If you can help growing my
> review template checklist or think of something to improve it, that
> would be really helpful. Also, if you spot any errors or have any
> comment, I will be happy to receive them.

I'd like to see links to packaging guidelines for each point (or at
least for non-obvious ones). It's helpful for the both parties to know
why they have to fix things.

> I plan to put up some scripts to automate part of the review process
> as soon as I have the time to finish them.

That would be great.

-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101101/655e36fd/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list