Package review template

[Stanislav Ochotnicky]

On 11/02/2010 01:35 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to see links to packaging guidelines for each point (or at
>> least for non-obvious ones). It's helpful for the both parties to know
>> why they have to fix things.
> 
> That's a good idea. I don't know how to integrate them and at the same
> time don't make the template too noisy. I will try to work on that one
> because I think that would come handy for new reviewers.

What we did is we have references[1]. They seem to work fairly well and
they are not too noisy IMO. YMMV of course.


[1] Like this
-- 
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 71A1677C
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101102/07b94208/attachment.bin