Package review template
sochotnicky at redhat.com
Tue Nov 2 12:43:32 UTC 2010
On 11/02/2010 01:35 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to see links to packaging guidelines for each point (or at
>> least for non-obvious ones). It's helpful for the both parties to know
>> why they have to fix things.
> That's a good idea. I don't know how to integrate them and at the same
> time don't make the template too noisy. I will try to work on that one
> because I think that would come handy for new reviewers.
What we did is we have references. They seem to work fairly well and
they are not too noisy IMO. YMMV of course.
 Like this
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101102/07b94208/attachment.bin
More information about the devel