Changes in Java packaging guidelines - RFC

[Jesse Keating]

On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
> managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
> not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
> say? (and on this subject, I don't think Fedora Java can be dissociated
> from Red Hat java)

JBoss isn't in Fedora because JBoss seems to require lots of things that
are older than what we ship in Fedora.  I see this is a problem with
JBoss, not Fedora.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101103/9c6f6794/attachment.bin