bugzilla bugzappers?

Michel Alexandre Salim salimma at fedoraproject.org
Thu Nov 4 23:30:29 UTC 2010

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:57:58 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:

> * Orcan Ogetbil [04/11/2010 09:35] :
>> The extreme inefficiency comes from the bugs that I can't reproduce,
>> the upstream can't reproduce, and the user isn't responding. And this
>> happens *a lot*. Most of the time, they don't even put down the steps
>> to reproduce. Can we at least mandate including the steps to reproduce
>> in the ABRT reports?
> Is there any reason you can't close these bugs with a INSUFFICIENT_DATA
> resolution? This seems to be the most appropriate thing to do in this
> case.
Even better: can abrt-reported bugs that have been NEEDINFO for more 
than, say, 7 days be automatically closed INSUFFICIENT_DATA?

That'd be quite a huge timesaver. Better duplicate detection would be 
nice too.

Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  salimma at fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: 78884778
Jabber: hircus at jabber.ccc.de       | IRC: hircus at irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

More information about the devel mailing list