Should gpg use alternatives?

[Sam Varshavchik]

Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as 
/usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced with a 
symlink managed by alternatives?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101106/119d0415/attachment-0001.bin