Should gpg use alternatives?

Sam Varshavchik mrsam at
Sat Nov 6 21:20:02 UTC 2010

Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as 
/usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced with a 
symlink managed by alternatives?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the devel mailing list