The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

[Till Maas]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:19:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:

> Thanks for flagging this up.
> 
> I'm wondering if perhaps we should devise a system - maybe a sub-group
> of proventesters - to ensure timely testing of security updates. wdyt?

I am not sure if a smaller group would help here. But what is certainly
missing is proper monitoring of updates that need to be tested asap and
notify testers or people in charge of untested updates.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101113/a655ccc3/attachment.bin