The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sun Nov 21 22:39:14 UTC 2010
David Nalley wrote:
> I think this is an interesting idea, but I'll also say I think it can
> be made simpler. Why not just hold package maintainers accountable
> period. Make them accountable to FESCo (which in theory they are to
> begin with) If I, as a package maintainer continuously want to 'push
> directly to stable' and continuously screw it up, I'd hope FESCo and
> my original sponsor would at least tell me I am doing it wrong.
Let people use their brains. If they screw up, yell at them, and work on
informing people in a better way so such mistakes don't happen again.
Bureaucracy is not the right solution to prevent mistakes, education is.
More information about the devel