Fedora release model (was Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17))
awilliam at redhat.com
Mon Nov 22 18:35:25 UTC 2010
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:23 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> * A major version should be imposed every 6 months if it
> has not for some reason.
Why? Your idea of tying version bumps to actual changes in the product
rather than an arbitrary timeline is an interesting one, but then having
a backstop forced version bump every six months even if there is no
relevant change completely undercuts the idea.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the devel