Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Tue Nov 23 07:35:06 UTC 2010


On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:18:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 16:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> writes:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:02 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > >> Critpath requires +1 proven tester and +1 anybody.  Total of +2.  Non
> > >> crit-path requires a minimum of +1 anybody or a 7 day timeout I do believe.
> > >> 
> > >> I do not believe we require +3 anywhere.  We /default/ the karma
> > >> autopush level at +3/-3, but that's just a suggestion.
> > 
> > > we should probably change it to +2 or even +1.
> > 
> > Yeah.  Or at least document that the maintainer is allowed to reduce it;
> > that's entirely unclear given the current policy and bodhi UI.
> 
> The bodhi 2.0 solution is to decouple autopush and acceptance: they
> really shouldn't be paired, I think it's just an unintended consequence
> of the current code. You should be able to set +1 threshold for
> acceptance allowing the maintainer to then push manually, and +3 for
> autopush, for instance.

Afaik there is no need for a maintainer to set different acceptance
thresholds for his updates. At least nobody ever explained to me why
this would be helpful.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101123/69618bfb/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list