jskala at redhat.com
Tue Nov 30 07:46:27 UTC 2010
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:34 +0000, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> wrote:
> > have no problems with it and I maintain around 120 packages. Filter it
> > if you don't like it.
> Are you interrested in such notifications?
Discussion about filtering/blocking mentioned messages is about how to
fix consequence but...
The discussion should search for improving source of the problem.
What about source of this? I could count e.g.:
- missing reaction of QA
- missing approval for the package to be moved to stable
- missing additional action of developer
I've got a lot messages due to one package (needs modem for testing). I
contacted some concerned people directly and I'm glad to say this
situation has no more repeated with this package. This works fine.
I believe only a little portion of packages are related to this problem.
Well, I'm convinced better is "ask for action" then to discuss what
More information about the devel