ldd regression in F14B

[Alberto Bertogli]

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 10/04/2010 01:01 PM, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
> > Do you have any idea what may be causing this?
> 
> Do you get the same problem if you invoke /usr/bin/ld.bfd instead of just "ld"?

Yes.

$ ld -o libccheck.so -lc -shared && ldd libccheck.so
        not a dynamic executable
$ /usr/bin/ld.bfd -o libccheck.so -lc -shared && ldd libccheck.so
        not a dynamic executable

Both generated files are identical.

I also checked and /etc/alternatives/ld points to ld.bfd.


> I'm guessing that you're hitting ld.gold by default and it's behaving slightly
> differently than the old binutils linker did.

Actually, using ld.gold by hand complains about -lc and doesn't even link.

Thanks,
		Alberto