rawhide report: 20101019 changes

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com> said:
> On 10/19/2010 11:28 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > And how many of those bugs are exclusively a /usr-is-separate problem
> > vs. how many of them are didn't-anticipate-alternate-partitioning
> > problems?
> 
> If I understand your distinction correctly, then the overwhelming majority
> of them are the former.

The one that led to this discussion (626007) doesn't seem to be.

The "/usr/sbin/foo is needed before FSes are mounted" is a fairly
trivial problem to solve in the majority of cases; I don't see that as a
big deal.

If separate /usr isn't considered a valid configuration, why do we have
separate /bin, /sbin, /lib{,64}?
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.