HEADS UP: KDE/Qt update intentions in Fedora 13 (RFC)

[Manuel Escudero]

2010/10/25 Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>

> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:24:30 +0300
> Kalev Lember <kalev at smartlink.ee> wrote:
>
> > On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
> > > update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
> > > there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope,
> > > we'd like to hear any objections against update - bugs we can fix
> > > etc. Qt 4.7 is quite well tested, thanks to work on Fedora 14 (Qt
> > > 4.7 is already included) and a lot of users are actually using this
> > > combination in Fedora 13.
> >
> > KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much
> > larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major
> > version in a stable Fedora release is a good idea; it just causes too
> > much churn.
>
> ...snip...
>
> I agree with Kalev here. Qt upgrade in a stable release is to be
> avoided unless there's some severe bug or security issue that can't be
> backported.
>
> kevin
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

I have KDE 4.5.2 in my Fedora 13 wich as far as I understand uses the last
version of Qt, the computer is working Flawlessly :D

-- 
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlevick at googlewave.com
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31  1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101025/79860f6f/attachment.html