rawhide report: 20100901 changes
pbrobinson at gmail.com
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Wed Sep 1 12:39:47 UTC 2010
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Martin Sourada <martin.sourada at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 12:20 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
> <snip>
>> entangle-0.1.0-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
>> ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.i686 requires libmozjs.so
>> ethos-0.2.2-7.fc15.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
> <snip>
>> gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.i686 requires libmozjs.so
>> gjs-0.7.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
> <snip>
>> gnome-shell-2.31.5-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
> <snip>
>> gxine-0.5.905-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
> <snip>
>> libproxy-mozjs-0.4.4-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
> <snip>
>> openvrml-javascript-0.18.6-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
> <snip>
>> xulrunner-python-1.9.2-4.20100111hg.fc14.x86_64 requires libmozjs.so()(64bit)
>>
>
> So, it looks like somewhere between xulrunner-1.9.2.7 and 1.9.3.0
> libmozjs.so was lost. Why no HEADS UP? Is this a bug or should we just
> rebuild against new xulrunner or even switch to different js altogether?
It doesn't build against the new xulrunner.... I've tried. I suspect
its because of the major changes is JS but I'm not sure what the plans
are for it.
Peter
More information about the devel
mailing list