jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Sep 1 17:06:08 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 9/1/10 9:01 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Matt McCutchen <matt at mattmccutchen.net> writes:
>>> I propose that fedpkg should consider a --dist option, a "branch"
>>> file, and the name of the current git branch in that order.
>> Or make it a branch config (eg. git config branch.$branch.dist f14).
> This, please. Using magical branch names or files to decide what
> release a branch corresponds to seems silly when it can be a property of
> the branch itself.
We essentially do this now. We look at the branch merge point, which
tells me what upstream Fedora/RHEL branch you're tracking, which tells
me how to set the macros. It's only when you aren't tracking a remote
branch that things go south.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the devel