F-14 Branched report: 20100904 changes
kevin at scrye.com
Mon Sep 6 17:33:28 UTC 2010
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:13:11 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:14:12PM +0000, Branched Report wrote:
> > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.i686 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8
> > 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires febootstrap >=
> > 0:2.8
> Yup, this is a cock-up.
> I pushed libguestfs and febootstrap on the same day to testing
> (libguestfs in the morning, febootstrap in the afternoon). But
> febootstrap didn't go into testing for another 3 days.
> As a result, 7 days later, I pushed libguestfs thinking I could push
> the dependent febootstrap, but now in fact I have to wait another ~3
> days to do that. Since the "acceptance policy" overrides packager
> discretion, I just have to wait it out (or go through some other
> process palaver, it's easier just to wait).
Why not push both packages in the same update?
It's the only way to be sure they go out at the exact same time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100906/14af6e96/attachment.bin
More information about the devel