F-14 Branched report: 20100904 changes

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Mon Sep 6 17:33:28 UTC 2010


On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:13:11 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:14:12PM +0000, Branched Report wrote:
> > 	1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.i686 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8
> > 	1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires febootstrap >=
> > 0:2.8
> 
> Yup, this is a cock-up.
> 
> I pushed libguestfs and febootstrap on the same day to testing
> (libguestfs in the morning, febootstrap in the afternoon).  But
> febootstrap didn't go into testing for another 3 days.
> 
> As a result, 7 days later, I pushed libguestfs thinking I could push
> the dependent febootstrap, but now in fact I have to wait another ~3
> days to do that.  Since the "acceptance policy" overrides packager
> discretion, I just have to wait it out (or go through some other
> process palaver, it's easier just to wait).
> 
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/febootstrap-2.9-1.fc14

Why not push both packages in the same update? 

It's the only way to be sure they go out at the exact same time. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100906/14af6e96/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list