F12/ Cannot update
thomasj at fedoraproject.org
Wed Sep 15 07:53:21 UTC 2010
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
> Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> Why xulrunner has been built against this and pushed to stable?
> Because Firefox/Thunderbird maintainers have the ability to
> Push-To-Stable regardless of what the Fedora package policies say. Harrumph.
> I have previously complained of this fact before when these packages
> broke things but my complaints fell on deaf ears. What is the correct
> course of action to stop this nonsense?
File a ticket with FESCo. We should have "*all* packages go trough
updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the
reason of an update". If FESCo finds out that this is a bug (some
packages can be pushed to stable directly) in Bodhi, fix it, ASAP.
My security fix build was rejected going to stable directly, because
it could break anything (freeciv game), so i expect critical packages
for end users have to go trough as well.
More information about the devel