Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)

Rahul Sundaram metherid at
Wed Sep 15 11:17:43 UTC 2010

 On 09/15/2010 04:29 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> It is still necessary to take into account users who think that
> Gnome-Shell is something like KDE4 :)

In what specific way?  They can just continue using GNOME Panel.

>> GNOME Shell is also different from systemd
>> in the sense that it affects every single user of Fedora and deserves a
>> closer scrutiny.
> Ouh, but Gnome shell would affect 50% of Fedora users.

We don't really have any reliable stats for DE usage.

>> FWIW, I think GNOME Shell deserves extensive testing
>> before made as default as well. FESCo's handling of systemd feature as a
>> process has gaps that needs to be fixed as well. Nevertheless, I would
>> like to thank Lennart for his extensive work on getting systemd where it
>> is now in such a short period and Matthew Miller for playing the role of
>> a very constructive critic and following up on bugs methodologically.
> I agree that SystemD should be in reasonable stable state for making
> it default init. Also very constructive criticism has helped this
> project.
> But I feel that:
> - may be too early to cut it as default init from the release - I see
> no problem if would have been given another month to Lennart for
> fixing latest "critical" documentation issues
> - problems that you point out in the email to test@ IMHO do not have
> any major significance

You are confusing me.  There aren't any "critical" documentation issues.
  My list is a specific one.  What you have is a subjective feeling.  


More information about the devel mailing list