Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)
metherid at gmail.com
Wed Sep 15 11:17:43 UTC 2010
On 09/15/2010 04:29 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> It is still necessary to take into account users who think that
> Gnome-Shell is something like KDE4 :)
In what specific way? They can just continue using GNOME Panel.
>> GNOME Shell is also different from systemd
>> in the sense that it affects every single user of Fedora and deserves a
>> closer scrutiny.
> Ouh, but Gnome shell would affect 50% of Fedora users.
We don't really have any reliable stats for DE usage.
>> FWIW, I think GNOME Shell deserves extensive testing
>> before made as default as well. FESCo's handling of systemd feature as a
>> process has gaps that needs to be fixed as well. Nevertheless, I would
>> like to thank Lennart for his extensive work on getting systemd where it
>> is now in such a short period and Matthew Miller for playing the role of
>> a very constructive critic and following up on bugs methodologically.
> I agree that SystemD should be in reasonable stable state for making
> it default init. Also very constructive criticism has helped this
> But I feel that:
> - may be too early to cut it as default init from the release - I see
> no problem if would have been given another month to Lennart for
> fixing latest "critical" documentation issues
> - problems that you point out in the email to test@ IMHO do not have
> any major significance
You are confusing me. There aren't any "critical" documentation issues.
My list is a specific one. What you have is a subjective feeling.
More information about the devel