Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Wed Sep 15 12:22:54 UTC 2010


On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:18 +0100, M A Young wrote:

> But you can base it on what bugs were raised or still open during the 
> alpha phase. If there were a lot of issues during the alpha phase then 
> that is likely to continue in the beta phase. That was why I was 
> suggesting you count all blocker bugs, not just those that are still open.
> It doesn't guarantee that there will or won't be be any critical bugs but 
> it does give an objective measure of how stable and well tested the code 
> is.

Not entirely: see my reply to your previous. Not all packages are equal
from the point of view of 'susceptibility to blocker bugs'. anaconda
wouldn't do well on a measure of 'how many blocker bugs are opened
against this component in alpha' either, but it doesn't mean anaconda
sucks and should be removed =)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list