Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Thu Sep 16 16:19:47 UTC 2010
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:11:21PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
> > I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> > it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> > user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> > Fedora or even to get the admins to install RHEL packages in a timely
> > manner. Building statically also helps me to eliminate as many of the
> > inevitable fractional differences between cluster nodes as possible, to
> > achieve reproducible results from simulation runs.
> > However, only a few packages in Fedora provide -static variants. This
> > has meant that I've had to locally build these, which is obviously not
> > desirable from a maintenance perspective.
> > So, would be acceptable to register requests for -static package
> > variants as tickets on bugzilla? Or is there a better way to try to
> > encourage people to generate these packages?
> Better yet is not to link statically.
There are times when static linking is a useful. Robert clearly
describes one in his original post. I also use static linking as a
way to distribute binaries that will run on a range of Linux
Uli's claim that static linking's benefits "never been the case and
never will be the case" is complete drivel IMHO.
[*] In fact, I wrote a nice little script to help:
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
More information about the devel