PostgreSQL 9 for F14?

Gerald Henriksen ghenriks at
Tue Sep 21 00:52:12 UTC 2010

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:26:53 -0400, you wrote:

>On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
><fedora at> wrote:
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:42 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> No, I'm not advocating PgSQL 9 for F14, however, it shouldn't be so
>>> far-fetched that Fedora could have any software at any time.
>> A Fedora update policy is being hashed out, and even before that, the
>> consensus is really against introducing major updates in stable releases.
>> It's not really "anything goes" as your statement seems to imply.
>A parallel update is a major update requiring a 6 month wait in Fedora now?

I would guess that the PostgreSQL maintainer(s) would prefer to only
maintain one version in Fedora at a time.

Really though, if people wanted PostgreSQL 9 in Fedora 14 they should
have started asking about it or working on it months ago, getting it
into Rawhide before the Fedora 14 split.

More information about the devel mailing list