Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Sep 22 22:18:57 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/22/2010 05:06 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Well "use rawhide" for anything else than testing and/or developing
> the new release just do not fly.
> Some of the reasons I can think of:
> 1) To high rate of changes / breakage
Not much one can do on this one, other than choose when to apply their
> 2) No signed packages
We will be fixing that, so that anything that falls out of koji will get
signed (except scratch builds)
> 3) Slower kernel
Not much I can do about that.
> 4) To much of "manual fixing" required
> 5) To many broken deps, which might prevent applying updates and security fixes
> 6) Some others that I can't think of right now might be a consequence
> of the above or something else
I think those can be addressed by placing an AutoQA filter between a
build from master and the build showing up in rawhide.
> So please stop proposing rawhide for productive systems (or even
> database servers *shrug*).
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the devel