Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Sep 22 22:19:28 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/22/2010 04:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
>> packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity checks
>> (eg. does it boot, can an X server be started).
> That's basically the proven testers process, which at present is running
> around capacity trying to cover three releases (two current stable, plus
> Branched). I'm really not sure we could manage another release,
> especially one like Rawhide where people have a right to expect updates
> to land quickly.
I think the idea is to apply an AutoQA filter between the builds and
showing up in rawhide, not applying a bunch of human tester filters and
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the devel