REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

[drago01]

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:01:02 +0200,
>  Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I say that the example of Webkit should be removed because if it is not
>> possible to backport the security patch and due to the version update
>> Midori has to be updated to a new version regardless of the changes of
>> user experience. The part of the example "judgement call based on how
>> intrusive the changes are" does not make any sense. We just cannot keep
>> the old insecure version regardless on how intrusive the changes are.
>
> Security isn't binary. It may be that a security update addresses an issue
> that can not happen in normal cases. It might be reasonable to just document
> the cases where there is a problem so as to warn people not to do that.

NO, security issues ought to be *fixed* not just documented.