Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
ghenriks at gmail.com
Thu Sep 23 01:30:02 UTC 2010
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:33:22 +0000 (UTC), you wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:33:47 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> That is what branched releases have. Running one of these still gets you
>> pretty up to date stuff, but a bit more protection from breakage.
>But branched releases stabilize sometime before the beta point is
>reached, which triggered off this huge discussion in the first place,
>because Postgresql 9.0 came out too late for inclusion.
But did Postgresql 9 come out too late?
PostgreSQL had a 2nd beta release on June 4th, which could have gone
into Rawhide, and hence allowed PostgreSQL 9 to be in Fedora 14
(assuming that the packager had time to do it, and confidence that the
PostgreSQL final release would have been in time).
After all Gnome 2.32 isn't released until later this month, and the
beta releases have been included in Fedora 14 up to now.
More information about the devel