Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)
drago01 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 23 08:25:04 UTC 2010
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 September 2010 08:37, drago01 <drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well this cycle there was "on the way to gnome3 and back" situation,
>> which caused a lot of churn (even upstream).
> For what it's worth, the GNOME "will we, won't we" on a few different
> issues (GApplication, GTK3, etc) has cost a lot of developer time, and
> from an upstream perspective was a royal pain in the behind.
That's what I meant with "even upstream".
> I think
> Matthias has done a wonderful job keeping F14 in some sort of
> semblance, even with all this upstream turmoil.
No disagreement here.
> I think 2.32 is going to be a pretty good, stable release, but a lot
> of people (myself included) are saving the new bells and whistles for
> GNOME 3.0. Expect the Fedora 15 feature page for GNOME to read a
> little more interesting, for sure.
Neither here ;)
More information about the devel