thomasj at fedoraproject.org
Sun Sep 26 11:41:38 UTC 2010
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
> Brandon Lozza <brandon at pwnage.ca> wrote:
>> It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid
>> panics :)
> Well, I personally do not want to say:
> "Hey, anytime you like down the road, you get an exception to push a
> new major version. Have fun".
Well, reading FESCo meeting, it was that we're allowed to do one major
update to Fn due to the different release-cycles of Fedora and KDE.
Bad enough that we need "exceptions" to do our expected work and be
able to be the working official KDE part of Fedora.
> We still need to see what all is in the update, what the pros and cons
> are, etc.
Huh? And who of non-KDE FESCo members can decide what is pro or con in
a KDE update? Are we allowed to decide what is pro or con in a GNOME
update? Which would be the same here. No, the GNOME folks decide what
gets updated, as well as the XFCE or LXDE folks do, and that's as it
> I could add an example showing this however. :)
> Let me do that.
Now i'm curious.
More information about the devel