REVIEW/RFC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Updates_Policy_Draft

Thomas Janssen thomasj at fedoraproject.org
Sun Sep 26 13:33:25 UTC 2010


On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:41:38 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:53:49 -0400
>>> Brandon Lozza <brandon at pwnage.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would be nice to list it somewhere as an exception, to avoid
>>>> panics :)
>>>
>>> Well, I personally do not want to say:
>>>
>>> "Hey, anytime you like down the road, you get an exception to push a
>>> new major version. Have fun".
>>
>>Well, reading FESCo meeting, it was that we're allowed to do one major
>>update to Fn due to the different release-cycles of Fedora and KDE.
>>Bad enough that we need "exceptions" to do our expected work and be
>>able to be the working official KDE part of Fedora.
>
> Perhaps then you should approach KDE and ask them why they are so
> distribution unfriendly with their release schedule.

Why should they align the releases more with Fedora? Because Fedora is
the #1 KDE distro? Think about it. KDE isn't distribution unfriendly.
Fedora lately becomes KDE unfriendly. *Please* stop to rant, all the
ranting becomes old quickly.

-- 
Best regards
Thomas


More information about the devel mailing list