x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform
Bruno Wolff III
bruno at wolff.to
Mon Sep 27 21:45:16 UTC 2010
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:35:43 +0200,
drago01 <drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:00:45 +0200,
> > drago01 <drago01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The x86_64 vs. i686 thing aside ... IMO the CD size limit does more
> >> harm than good and should have been lifted a while ago.
> > The CD size limit is self imposed by the Spins that choose to do so.
> My point was that "but it does not fit on a CD" is a moot point.
The individual spins groups decide that for their spins. Some of them
seem to think targeting CDs is important. I don't know the specific reasons
as I am not in any of those groups. (I do handle the Games Spin, but that
targets 4 GiB.)
If you want to change their minds, you should consider participating in
the relavent groups.
As for supporting larger possible spin sizes, I am all for that. That's
why I pushed for UDF and LZMA support for livecd-tools.
More information about the devel