critpath approval process seems rather broken

[Christopher Aillon]

On 04/11/2011 12:13 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 07:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 18:19:26 -0700,
>>    Christopher Aillon<caillon at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I just realized today for the first time that our nightlies are based on
>>> stable, not testing.  I think that's something we need to address.  It's
>>> probably still useful to have nightlies based on stable, but I think
>>> it's rather vital to have images created with the updates in the queue.
>>
>> The nightlies are intended to be made from stable, so that they are more
>> likely to work and near releases (including test ones) corrsepond to
>> the upcoming release.
>
> I definitely agree that the nightlies need to be made from stable sources.

And I did too.  I also agree that we need to get nightlies made with 
testing.  I don't think this is an either-or situation.