AutoQA: distro congestion?

[Andreas Bierfert]

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 04:35 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa
> > rejected
> > the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the
> packages
> > to be properly pushed to f<N+1> stable before green-lighting the
> > matching package for f<N>. 
> 
> I suppose you're talking about upgradepath test. Yes, that's exactly
> its behavior. 

This seems wrong to me. If I as a packager create an upgrade in bodhi,
autoqa should consider what is present in f<N+1> not only as stable
package but also as proposed upgrade. It should then impose a constraint
that the upgrade for f<N> can only be pushed to stable if f<N+1> is
pushed to stable at the same time (or obviously independently before). 

Seeing a failed upgradepath test comment at least gives me the wrong
feeling on what is going on.

- Andreas
-- 
BrandAss Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. | phone: +49 6897 1721738 | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de   | fax:   +49 6897 1722828 | signed/encrypted
http://lowlatency.de             | cell:  +49 170  9665206 | mail preferred
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110418/6be8835d/attachment.bin