AutoQA: distro congestion?

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > > Some packagers have been observed circumventing the system by
> > > configuring a karma threshold of 1, so their own +1 vote or the
> > > first one from an arbitrary tester make it possible to mark the
> > > update stable.
> > 
> > Not...really. The update submitter's own vote should count as 0 (I
> > can't remember if this has landed in current Bodhi yet). Setting the
> > karma threshold to 1 cannot circumvent the 'proventesters +1 and any
> > +1' requirement for stable releases; just try it, it doesn't work. The
> > correct requirements are enforced whatever you set the autopush
> > threshold to.
> 
> I just tried it (ok after the threshold of 3 days in f15) and it worked:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipython-0.10.2-1.fc15

F15 is a pre-release and does not have that requirement. Its requirement
is +1 from anyone - so you're not circumventing anything. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net