AutoQA: distro congestion?
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed Apr 20 07:56:03 UTC 2011
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Maybe the bodhi messages confused me. When I logon to a.f.o/updates it
> > prominently displays:
> >
> > Bodhi is now enforcing the Package Update Acceptance
> > Criteria across all Fedora releases.
>
> The criteria which are being enforced do not include AutoQA results at this
> time. They do, however, include minimum testing (time and/or karma)
> requirements, which probably explains why your stable request was rejected.
> (And I've been fighting against those requirements since they were first
> proposed, because I strongly believe this decision should really be up to
> the maintainer, but I lost that battle.)
Well, two questions:
a) Weren't updates marked as security updates handled specially? E.g.
the packages to get tagged as push-requested with the final decision
being a pusher's review of the request?
b) In the past if karma/time requirements were not met one could still
mark the request and the request would show up. Possibly not
granted/processed until the requirements were met (unless the package
was security related or fixing a too nasty bug), but not immediately
cleared as if it never happened (which is the current state).
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110420/44973ca0/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list