2011-04-21 - F-15 blocker bug review #2 - recap
James Laska
jlaska at redhat.com
Thu Apr 21 19:30:34 UTC 2011
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-21/f15-blocker-review.2011-04-21-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (jlaska, 17:00:52)
* Introduction (jlaska, 17:05:53)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
(jlaska, 17:06:02)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Final_Release_Criteria
(jlaska, 17:06:07)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(jlaska, 17:06:21)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/695389 (jlaska, 17:07:42)
* fixed in anaconda-15.28-1 (jlaska, 17:07:59)
* clumens expects a new build to arrive later today (waiting on a
transifex change) (jlaska, 17:12:42)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689260 (jlaska, 17:13:37)
* waiting in NEEDINFO (jlaska, 17:14:48)
* AGREED: 689260 - update bug with request for info, CLOSE at next
meeting if no updates (jlaska, 17:16:27)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682001 (jlaska, 17:16:43)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695492 (jlaska, 17:19:18)
* AGREED: 695492 - AcceptedNTH - Seek guidance from bruno, nirik or
cwickert to proceed (jlaska, 17:24:32)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696278 (jlaska, 17:25:00)
* AGREED: 696278 - NEEDINFO - unclear what cause is, request more
information from reporter (jlaska, 17:31:30)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696107 (jlaska, 17:32:02)
* Fixed by NetworkManager-openconnect-0.8.1-9.git20110419.fc15
(jlaska, 17:33:00)
* AGREED: 696107 - RejectedBlocker RejectedNTH - With testing, updated
NM-openconnect package will land in 'stable' (jlaska, 17:35:28)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678236 (jlaska, 17:35:50)
* AGREED: 678236 - AcceptedNTH - doesn't impact blocker criteria, but
likely a visible bug. Continue working issue with maintainer
(jlaska, 17:43:59)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697834 (jlaska, 17:46:32)
* AGREED: 697834 - AcceptedBlocker - impacts desktop release criteria,
maintainer investigating (jlaska, 17:48:29)
* additional work needed to determine scope of changes needed to
resolve System;Settings; menu items (jlaska, 17:56:05)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674799 (jlaska, 17:56:29)
* LINK:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-desktop3-3.0.0-2.fc15
(jlaska, 17:57:24)
* AGREED: 674799 - AcceptedNTH - appears to only provide upstream
GNOME backgrounds, which are not the default in F15 (jlaska,
18:04:08)
* Fix available for testing (jlaska, 18:04:36)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698184 (jlaska, 18:04:39)
* AGREED: 698184 - AcceptedNTH - further testing of F14->F15 upgrades
may elevate to AcceptedBlocker (jlaska, 18:08:30)
* ACTION: jlaska - test F14->F15 upgrade 698184 (jlaska, 18:09:10)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695730 (jlaska, 18:09:45)
* AGREED: 695730 - RejectedNTH RejectedBlocker - updated fedora
packages available for testing, rpmfusion will need to rebuild
-plugins (jlaska, 18:13:22)
* HELP: anyone able to reach out to rpmfusion for the needed gstreamer
plugin rebuilds? (jlaska, 18:13:42)
* ACTION: adamw - notify rpmfusion about 695730 and gstreamer plugin
rebuilds (jlaska, 18:14:04)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696510 (jlaska, 18:14:15)
* AGREED: 696510 - AcceptedNTH RejectedBlocker - A fix is available
for testing, a proper fix might be to adjust comps instead (jlaska,
18:22:34)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693809 (jlaska, 18:24:43)
* AGREED: 693809 - AcceptedBlocker - May also impact other desktops,
continue discussion in bug (jlaska, 18:37:23)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693442 (jlaska, 18:37:37)
* AGREED: 693442 - RejectedBlocker + RejectedNTH - impact does not
affect criteria at this time (jlaska, 18:41:24)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697008 (jlaska, 18:41:41)
* Previously reviewed and rejected (jlaska, 18:43:04)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678555 (jlaska, 18:43:24)
* AGREED: 678555 - AcceptedNTH - ON_QA with a pending fix in bodhi
already, testing needed (jlaska, 18:48:20)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692230 (jlaska, 18:48:38)
* ACTION: jlaska - 692230 - retest and update impact statement
(jlaska, 18:50:19)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696320 (jlaska, 18:51:01)
* AGREED: 696320 - AcceptedBlocker - waiting on guidance for further
systemd debugging (jlaska, 18:56:08)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694765 (jlaska, 18:57:13)
* AGREED: 694765 - AcceptedNTH (jlaska, 18:58:45)
* This should be moved back to ASSIGNED based on reporter feedback
(jlaska, 18:58:58)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693302 (jlaska, 18:59:09)
* AGREED: 693302 - AcceptedNTH - patch out for review on
anaconda-devel@ (jlaska, 19:02:13)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662800 (jlaska, 19:03:45)
* AGREED: 662800 - RejectedNTH - discussed at previous blocker review
(jlaska, 19:04:52)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697689 (jlaska, 19:06:33)
* AGREED: 697689 - AcceptedNTH - infringes desktop criteria for a
non-default desktop (jlaska, 19:07:48)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683265 (jlaska, 19:08:18)
* AGREED: 683265 - AcceptedNTH (jlaska, 19:11:00)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688302 (jlaska, 19:12:36)
* AGREED: 688302 - AcceptedNTH (jlaska, 19:15:28)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697649 (jlaska, 19:16:23)
* AGREED: 697649 - AcceptedNTH - desktop issue affecting non-default
desktop (jlaska, 19:18:09)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697188 (jlaska, 19:18:20)
* AGREED: 697188 - AcceptedNTH - Will accept a tested fix if provided
before release (jlaska, 19:24:35)
* make it clear to lennart that NTH means that he can still choose not
to do the change (tflink, 19:25:05)
* Open Discussion (jlaska, 19:25:26)
* in the bug update, please make it clear to lennart that NTH means
that he can still choose not to do the change (tflink, 19:25:33)
Meeting ended at 19:28:25 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* jlaska - test F14->F15 upgrade 698184
* adamw - notify rpmfusion about 695730 and gstreamer plugin rebuilds
* jlaska - 692230 - retest and update impact statement
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
* adamw - notify rpmfusion about 695730 and gstreamer plugin rebuilds
* jlaska
* jlaska - test F14->F15 upgrade 698184
* jlaska - 692230 - retest and update impact statement
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* jlaska (340)
* adamw (169)
* tflink (87)
* dgilmore (72)
* halfline (33)
* buggbot (28)
* rbergeron (18)
* caillon (15)
* clumens (7)
* zodbot (5)
* robatino (3)
* StylusEater (2)
* nirik (1)
* jsmith (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110421/8b417437/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list