Btrfs status for F16

[Josef Bacik]

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists <lists at sapience.com> wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
>>>> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
>>>> slow going process.  With your help we will be in a better situation
>>>> for F17.  Thanks,
>>>
>
>  Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
> RAID-5 on btrfs  as well if you don't mind?

It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind specifically but I
imagine that stuff will land in 3.2 to get plenty of testing, and then
the RAID5 stuff will follow.  Or both could land in 3.2, I'm not
entirely sure.  Thanks,

Josef