Btrfs status for F16

[Farkas Levente]

On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists <lists at sapience.com> wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>>> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
>>>>> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
>>>>> slow going process.  With your help we will be in a better situation
>>>>> for F17.  Thanks,
>>>>
>>
>>  Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
>> RAID-5 on btrfs  as well if you don't mind?
> 
> It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
> for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind specifically but I
> imagine that stuff will land in 3.2 to get plenty of testing, and then
> the RAID5 stuff will follow.  Or both could land in 3.2, I'm not
> entirely sure.  Thanks,

it seems obvious that a lots of people waiting for btrfs. may be it'd
useful to create some kind of roadmap, missing features, planed kernel
release etc..
it's clear that one of the zfs biggest feature is the raid and fs layer
merge. how does it planed in btrfs etc...

ps. anyway it was a good decision to shift as default fs.

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"