Btrfs status for F16

Robyn Bergeron rbergero at redhat.com
Mon Aug 8 18:31:26 UTC 2011


On 08/08/2011 05:44 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
> hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
> Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
> filed against it, let me announce this as clearly as possible
>
> BTRFS WILL NOT BE THE DEFAULT FILE SYSTEM FOR F16
>
> Fesco outlined basic requirements that needed to be met by Alpha for
> the switch to be allowed to happen and we have not met those
> requirements so it won't be happening for F16.
>
> I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
> working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
> slow going process.  With your help we will be in a better situation
> for F17.  Thanks,
Thanks for the update. I'm going to take it off the Feature List, and 
recategorize the Feature back to FeaturePageIncomplete.

Next time! :)

-Robyn
> Josef



More information about the devel mailing list