Fedora 16 Alpha to slip by one week.
Robyn Bergeron
rbergero at redhat.com
Thu Aug 11 03:21:29 UTC 2011
Today at the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Alpha by one
week[1]. Minutes follow below.
There are numerous unresolved blocker bugs at this time[2], requiring
the creation of an RC4 once these blockers are resolved.
As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be
pushed out by one week.
We will proceed with having the F16 Alpha readiness meeting tomorrow,
2011-08-11, as previously announced on the Logistics mailing list. We
will have another F16 Alpha Blocker Bug meeting this Friday.
The adjustments to the F16 schedule will be done (very late) tonight,
and published to the Schedule wiki page[3].
Thanks for your patience. We will be meeting again next Wednesday for
another Go/No-Go meeting.
-Robyn
[1] Logs:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-10/f16_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2011-08-10-21.00.log.html
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-10/f16_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2011-08-10-21.00.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/16/Schedule
===========================================
#fedora-meeting: F16 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting
===========================================
Meeting started by rbergeron at 21:00:26 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-10/f16_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2011-08-10-21.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* present: spot, codeblock, dgilmore, pjones, athmane, cebbert,
jsmith-mobile, adamw (rbergeron, 21:03:42)
* Go/No-Go Meeting (rbergeron, 21:04:07)
* the Purpose of the Go/No-Go is to gather yay/nay's from Release
Engineering, QA, and devel on whether or not what we have put
together is ready for release and meets the release criteria.
(rbergeron, 21:05:28)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting (adamw,
21:06:17)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers <--
that one I know by heart, though. (rbergeron, 21:06:42)
* Proposed Blockers (rbergeron, 21:09:50)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729563
(rbergeron, 21:10:04)
* clumens has an updates image (linked in BZ) for people to try out.
(rbergeron, 21:12:33)
* AGREED: : #729563, NTH Alpha, consider adding criterion for selinux
must be enabled by default later. (rbergeron, 21:14:39)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729500 (rbergeron,
21:15:04)
* Error while installing updates on Fedora 16 Alpha RC3 (rbergeron,
21:15:20)
* AGREED: revisit #729563 at Blocker meeting friday, try to get more
testers. PLEASE TEST THIS ONE AND TRY TO DUPLICATE, FOLKS!
(rbergeron, 21:17:34)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729528 (rbergeron,
21:17:53)
* #729528 - Unable to configure events in reporter to forward in
anaconda for F-16-Alpha-RC3 (rbergeron, 21:18:09)
* AGREED: #729528 Alpha Blocker, per criterion of installer must be
able to report failures to BZ, wiht appropriate info included.
(rbergeron, 21:22:19)
* http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729537 (rbergeron,
21:22:53)
* 729537 - Anaconda cannot report crashes in text mode in F16 Alpha
RC3 due to missing report-cli (rbergeron, 21:23:14)
* AGREED: 729537 Alpha Blocker, per criterion of installer must be
able to report failures to BZ, with appropriate info included.
(rbergeron, 21:25:32)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728707 (rbergeron,
21:25:48)
* 728707 - on package upgrade RPM is removing empty directories
accidentally (rbergeron, 21:26:02)
* AGREED: 728707 is a blocker under 'must be able to install updates'
criterion - this constitutes not installing updates properly
(adamw, 21:33:36)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729600 (adamw, 21:37:37)
* LINK:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media-UNIX_Linux.html
(jlk, 21:47:30)
* AGREED: 729600 not blocker or nth, installing from a dd'ed DVD iso
is expected to require extra configuration. documentation should be
improved to outline the steps required (adamw, 21:56:27)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728863 (adamw, 21:57:30)
* go/no-go vote (adamw, 22:00:30)
* AGREED: Fedora 16 Alpha is no-go at this time (adamw, 22:01:32)
* ACTION: rbergeron will take care of updating the schedules (adamw,
22:02:04)
* open floor (adamw, 22:03:40)
Meeting ended at 22:05:08 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* rbergeron will take care of updating the schedules
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* rbergeron
* rbergeron will take care of updating the schedules
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (167)
* rbergeron (73)
* pjones (66)
* jlk (49)
* dgilmore (36)
* Viking_Alpha (35)
* tflink (32)
* clumens (22)
* nirik (20)
* zodbot (6)
* spot (4)
* cebbert (3)
* athmane (2)
* CodeBlock (2)
* jsmith-mobile (1)
* tk009 (1)
* cwickert (1)
* jsmith (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce at lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
More information about the devel
mailing list