systemd not in critpath
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Aug 26 00:07:29 UTC 2011
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> >> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
> >> >> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
> >> >>
> >> > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script
> >> > that integrates with mash and pushes the information into pkgdb where bodhi
> >> > can then pull the information out. Maybe he'll be able to give us an update
> >> > on that or see if someone else familiar with mash can work on it.
> >> Its not the only one that's missing what should likely be classed as
> >> critpath, clutter should likely be added too because gnome-shell's
> >> dependency on it. I think the review of the crit path packages should
> >> be part of the release process. There's likely things that are no
> >> longer crit path and new things that are with each release.
> > I'm not sure that's the intent of CRITPATH. I think the original
> > definition was something on the order of "packages whose breakage can
> > prevent the system from booting to a command prompt".
> > If gnome-shell is broken, an admin can still get in on a virtual
> > terminal or other window manager.
> I believe it was for the primary desktop as well. Otherwise I doubt
> that things like libimobiledevice would be on that list :)
Yes, critpath includes default desktop.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel