Multiple identical udev rules -- safe?

Jonathan Dieter jdieter at lesbg.com
Tue Feb 1 10:16:10 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:04 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 31.01.2011 22:47, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> > Consider this file from nxt_python package:
> > 
> >   cat  /etc/udev/rules.d/70-lego.rules
> >   BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", GROUP="lego", MODE="0660"
> > 
> > Is it safe & sane to include an identical udev rule file in the nbc
> > package with different filename? To state the obvious -- it'd use the
> > same group name and mode.
> > 
> > Fallback plan is to prep a package just for this udev rule and depend
> > on it, but it seems unnecesary overhead.
> > 
> > 
> > m
> 
> Yes, it would be safe. It's just code duplication.
> Why does it use group "lego"? Is there a daemon running?
> Or should the console user have access to it?
> 

FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by
default.  Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and
play.

Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110201/9a8e23ae/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list