mass rebuild status

Kevin Fenzi kevin at
Wed Feb 9 16:09:57 UTC 2011

On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:35:37 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer at> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at>
> wrote:
> > <nod>  That does a great job of explaining what we had here.  The
> > difference this time is that instead of architecture being the key,
> > version of xz was the key.  The new and old versions of xz create
> > compatible archives but they aren't byte-for-byte identical.  That
> > could lead to certain circumstances where the rpm signature was
> > invalid for an rpm reconstructed from a deltarpm even though the
> > uncompressed data was the same.
> I updated the wiki page a bit.

Thank you Josh. It's appreciated. 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 

More information about the devel mailing list