mass rebuild status
kevin at scrye.com
Wed Feb 9 16:09:57 UTC 2011
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:35:37 -0500
Josh Boyer <jwboyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>
> > <nod> That does a great job of explaining what we had here. The
> > difference this time is that instead of architecture being the key,
> > version of xz was the key. The new and old versions of xz create
> > compatible archives but they aren't byte-for-byte identical. That
> > could lead to certain circumstances where the rpm signature was
> > invalid for an rpm reconstructed from a deltarpm even though the
> > uncompressed data was the same.
> I updated the wiki page a bit.
Thank you Josh. It's appreciated.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110209/eba5f943/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the devel