librsvg2 unmaintained?
Matthias Clasen
mclasen at redhat.com
Fri Feb 18 20:29:47 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/553069 (Nautilus) piles up duplicates.
>
> I've pointed out what's going wrong in librsvg2, one way to prevent the
> crash, and that there is another duplicate (for F-13) here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553069#c8
> --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603183
>
> Test-case files are attached to the ticket, another file is linked in a
> comment.
>
> The upstream ticket file several months ago about librsvg2 is unanswered,
> too:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626802
>
> Is librsvg2 unmaintained?
I would say it is 'weakly' maintained, like a great many other modules.
More information about the devel
mailing list