librsvg2 unmaintained?

Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com
Sun Feb 20 18:47:55 UTC 2011


On 18 February 2011 21:29, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/553069 (Nautilus) piles up duplicates.
>>
>> I've pointed out what's going wrong in librsvg2, one way to prevent the
>> crash, and that there is another duplicate (for F-13) here:
>>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553069#c8
>>   --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603183
>>
>> Test-case files are attached to the ticket, another file is linked in a
>> comment.
>>
>> The upstream ticket file several months ago about librsvg2 is unanswered,
>> too:
>>
>>   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626802
>>
>> Is librsvg2 unmaintained?
>
> I would say it is 'weakly' maintained, like a great many other modules.

Thanks for pushing a fix nevertheless. It has fixed Nautilus, Firefox,
Geeqie, ... and all other librsvg2 users.

In bugzilla 553069 many of the dupes are false positives due to ABRT
running wild with non-working detection of duplicates.


More information about the devel mailing list