Plans for BTRFS in Fedora
mcepl at redhat.com
Fri Feb 25 08:54:09 UTC 2011
Dne 24.2.2011 20:54, Ric Wheeler napsal(a):
> Can we have pointers to these crashes or BZ reports please? As Josef has
> noted, btrfs has been quite stable in our testing and we are certainly
> going to pursue any reports.
Will do ... I am hesitant to do so, because so many of my previous bug
reports didn't make much difference, and given fsck core dumping (for
the last three years), it seems to me that BTRFS is just nothing I would
take seriously. Yet.
> Just to answer your last question, we do not intend to "slow it down".
> Rather, we hope to speed it up considerably by adding developers,
> testing and users :)
I meant obviously slowing down accepting BTRFS as default filesystem for
Fedora and throwing away LVM from default, not development of BTRFS itself.
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6006 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110225/a23cd942/attachment.bin
More information about the devel