Plans for BTRFS in Fedora
sandeen at redhat.com
Fri Feb 25 15:42:03 UTC 2011
On 2/25/11 2:54 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 24.2.2011 20:54, Ric Wheeler napsal(a):
>> Can we have pointers to these crashes or BZ reports please? As Josef has
>> noted, btrfs has been quite stable in our testing and we are certainly
>> going to pursue any reports.
> Will do ... I am hesitant to do so, because so many of my previous bug
> reports didn't make much difference,
Do you have pointers to those? Were they on the kernel.org bugzilla, or
the red hat bugzilla, the list, or elsewhere?
> and given fsck core dumping (for
> the last three years), it seems to me that BTRFS is just nothing I would
> take seriously. Yet.
>> Just to answer your last question, we do not intend to "slow it down".
>> Rather, we hope to speed it up considerably by adding developers,
>> testing and users :)
> I meant obviously slowing down accepting BTRFS as default filesystem for
> Fedora and throwing away LVM from default, not development of BTRFS itself.
More information about the devel