Services that can start by default policy feedback

Bill Nottingham notting at
Mon Feb 28 16:53:25 UTC 2011

Kevin Fenzi (kevin at said: 
> Well, I think the rationale was "these are basic services that are
> required to bring the machine up into a gui and allow a user to login
> and be able to apply updates, etc" 
> At least that was my thought. 
> I wonder now if we couldn't use the critical path setup to define
> these. 
> Ie, "If your package is not critical path, it should not start by
> default. If it is, it _may_ start by default"

It's not bad, although it makes comps the arbiter, which seems a
little weird.


More information about the devel mailing list