gtk2 2.99.0

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:54:56PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "MC" == Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> writes:
> > 
> > MC> * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been
> > MC> dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in
> > MC> the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post
> > MC> of a gtk3-using package, you should add Requires(post):
> > MC> /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache (and similar for %postun).
> > 
> > I believe this is incorrect, or at least in conflict with the packaging
> > guidelines.  Those guidelines provide scriptlets which handle
> > gtk-update-icon-cache not being present, and explicitly indicate that
> > dependencies should not be added.
> > 
> > If the guidelines are incorrect, please let the packaging committee know
> > so that we can get them changed.
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
> 
> I guess you are right; as written the scriptlets don't require us to add
> those requires, and we are probably fine as long as gtk2 is still
> ubiquitous. But if you think of the long-term future, where there might
> be a gtk2-less install, we'll eventually make some adjustment here, e.g.
> by shipping gtk-update-icon-cache with gtk3 instead of gtk2.
> 
Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their
own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require.  That might be the best way
to resolve that.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110110/e8712376/attachment.bin