Updating waf to 1.6
Thomas Moschny
thomas.moschny at gmail.com
Tue Jan 18 00:06:53 UTC 2011
2011/1/17 Simo Sorce <ssorce at redhat.com>:
> The best thing is to not package waf on and in itself, and let package
> embed the right version. At least until waf becomes mature enough that
> the rate of change slows down to the point that option 1 becomes
> feasible.
>
> Option 2 is just begging for maintenance nightmares.
Seems most people agree on that pov. But it would be good to also get
FPC's blessing. One of the affected package maintainers should file a
trac ticket.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmail.com>
More information about the devel
mailing list